The Success of the War on Drugs.

Jul 1st, 2008 | By | Category: Public Health

For our little war on drugs, we’ve willfully ignored vast chunks of the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments. We might imprison the highest percentage of the population and the greatest absolute number of people in the world–leaving #2 China deep in our dust in this one measure–but, surely, our population is one of the most drug-free!

Let’s look at the data, thanks to a recently published article in PLoS Medicine surveying drug usage worldwide. How do we rank, next to the decadent drug-tolerant nations of the world. Hell, let’s make it easy and compare ourselves to the Netherlands. With all we’ve spent and sacrificed, we’ll certainly beat the Dutch, with their hash-bar loving ways.

First the legal drugs:

Ah, we can clearly see the perfidious Dutch are approximately as drunk as we are–up there with such unsavories as the Ukrainians and Germans. We tried prohibition and gave up. See what it did?

At least we show some leadership on the whole tobacco issue. Nothing more American than a Southern farm pumping out the good leaf.

Now on to the illicit.

Ahem. Well, despite pot being illegal in the US, and defacto legalized in the Netherlands, we end up at least trying pot at twice the rate. Certainly our draconian drug policies should at least keep hard drugs away from good and decent Americans.

Ahem. The taste of hard-fought and sweet success.

Snark aside, I think this is a quite good survey. But, we should be cautious before drawing too many causal connections.

The methodology seems quite solid, with the same survey used in each country–keeping comparisons between countries meaningful. Even the structure of the interview was shared between nations. Bilingual supervisors of the study were used for every country that participated. This in contrast to many similar studies that merely aggregate many individual surveys specific to a given nation–surveys that can differ dramatically in the both the questions asked and how the questions were asked. I’d be more apt to believe the comparisons in this study than the prior.

By asking “have you ever used,” the stigma threshold is also probably reduced–leading to more accurate responses. This is mostly speculation on my part, so feel free to disagree. On the converse, the rates of regular drug usage are probably quite different from this most lenient standard.

So far as inferences, there certainly was no correlation between the severity of a country’s drug laws and rates of drug usage. If drug laws did work, we’d at least expect some negative corrolation; while this doesn’t prove drug law are ineffective, it doesn’t really support the notion at all.

Some of the rates went against my expectations–Don’t the French supposedly smoke like chimneys? Neat.


One comment
Leave a comment »

  1. It’s time to remove all the politicians that promote prohibition.
    How many more lives have to be needlessly devastated or lost?
    Prohibited drugs are way easier for kids to get than regulated drugs!
    Prohibition never works it just causes crime and violence.

    The USA spends $69 billion a year on the drug war, builds 900 new prison beds and hires 150 more correction officers every two weeks, arrests someone on a drug charge every 17 seconds, jails more people than any nation and has killed over 100,000 citizens in the drug war.

    In 1914 when there were no prohibited drugs 1.3% of our population was addicted to drugs, today 1.3% of our population is still addicted to drugs but there’s way more crime and violence because of the huge profits prohibition generates. Drugs today are more potent, more readily available and less expensive than they were in the early 70’s when Richard Nixon started the war on drugs. Every time you look at the news you see more and more drug busts involving bigger and bigger quantities of drugs, not less and less… doesn’t that call for change?

    “Jury Nullification”, learn more here: If you are called for jury duty and you don’t agree with the law the person is charged with, you have the right to vote not guilty, no matter what evidence is produced. Jurors implementing this right in all non-violent drug cases will shut down the ridiculous laws of prohibition. One juror in each case is all it takes. The bottom line is a juror has the right to judge not only the accused person but the law the person is accused of breaking. Don’t be intimidated stick to your position.

    There’s only been one drug success story in history, tobacco, by far the most deadly and one of the most addictive drugs. Almost half the users quit because of regulation, accurate information and medical treatment. No one went to jail and no one got killed.

    The right; to freedom of religion, free speech, a free press, to keep and bear arms, to be secure in your person, house, papers and effects against unreasonable search and seizure, to life, liberty and property, to be protected from having your property taken by the government without due process of law and without just compensation, to confront the witnesses against you, to be protected from excessive bail, excessive fines, cruel and unusual punishment, to vote and many others have been denied to millions of Americans in the name of the drug war.

    Watch the videos:
    Internet explorer:
    Other browsers:

Leave Comment