<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Complement Cooperative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearscience.org/2008/09/23/the-complement-cooperative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/09/23/the-complement-cooperative/</link>
	<description>Seattle's Only Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:20:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: treacle</title>
		<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/09/23/the-complement-cooperative/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>treacle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearscience.org/?p=450#comment-414</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got my vote.  We should do it.  I&#039;m up for anything to break the gridlock that is our current &quot;global capitalist&quot; system of self-preservation over societal-benefit. 
I wonder, though, do you think that the greed encouraged by our current form of currency reinforces this IP gridlock?  Or is it completely unrelated?  Say if we have a currency bearing negative-interest (or simply no-interest), would companies still buy up competing ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got my vote.  We should do it.  I&#8217;m up for anything to break the gridlock that is our current &#8220;global capitalist&#8221; system of self-preservation over societal-benefit.<br />
I wonder, though, do you think that the greed encouraged by our current form of currency reinforces this IP gridlock?  Or is it completely unrelated?  Say if we have a currency bearing negative-interest (or simply no-interest), would companies still buy up competing ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Need an Industrial Policy</title>
		<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/09/23/the-complement-cooperative/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>We Need an Industrial Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearscience.org/?p=450#comment-410</guid>
		<description>[...] agreements. Policy like demanding the auto industry prepare for a post-carbon world. Policy that promotes and shares innovative technologies to US manufacturers. Part of this, I still believe, should be a helping hand to those who have done [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] agreements. Policy like demanding the auto industry prepare for a post-carbon world. Policy that promotes and shares innovative technologies to US manufacturers. Part of this, I still believe, should be a helping hand to those who have done [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

