<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: General Motor&#8217;s Interesting New Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearscience.org/2008/11/10/general-motors-interesting-new-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/11/10/general-motors-interesting-new-tech/</link>
	<description>Seattle's Only Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:25:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The GM Bailout</title>
		<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/11/10/general-motors-interesting-new-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>The GM Bailout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearscience.org/?p=576#comment-437</guid>
		<description>[...] of succeeding. At stake is a huge piece of the global industrial economy and the future of some genuinely innovative green technology. With the collapse of the mercantilist US-China trade of the past couple decades, Americans must [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of succeeding. At stake is a huge piece of the global industrial economy and the future of some genuinely innovative green technology. With the collapse of the mercantilist US-China trade of the past couple decades, Americans must [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Searchstupartlo&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Patent Office to study of the economic impact of software patents</title>
		<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/11/10/general-motors-interesting-new-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Searchstupartlo&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Patent Office to study of the economic impact of software patents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearscience.org/?p=576#comment-411</guid>
		<description>[...] General Motor’s Interesting New Tech [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] General Motor’s Interesting New Tech [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Need an Industrial Policy</title>
		<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/11/10/general-motors-interesting-new-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>We Need an Industrial Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearscience.org/?p=576#comment-409</guid>
		<description>[...] wrong to think of GM only as Hummers and Suburbans: GM’s heavy-duty hybrid technology would be far more revolutionary than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrong to think of GM only as Hummers and Suburbans: GM’s heavy-duty hybrid technology would be far more revolutionary than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bd</title>
		<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/11/10/general-motors-interesting-new-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>bd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearscience.org/?p=576#comment-400</guid>
		<description>Dear Science,

Some years ago, I heard of a GM technology that I have since referred to as an &quot;electro-sled&quot;.  It was a chassis containing a complete, gasoline-powered electric drive system onto which any number of automobile frames could be bolted, welded, or whatever.  Allegedly, it operated by drawing the electrons out of gasoline, or some such notion (fuel cell?), allegedly resulting in tremendous, daresay insane fuel efficiency.  They spent billions developing it, and I remember hearing, maybe a decade ago, and seeing on television news, that GM was celebrating some sort of milestone.  A bunch of executives standing around one of these electro-sleds, popping champagne corks while the press took pictures.  At that point, it should have been only several years before we started seeing cars in production.  And I haven&#039;t heard a word about the thing since.  And now GM is teetering over the abyss, and we&#039;re never going to see what should have started the migration away from the combustion engine.

Was this a dream?  If not, what the hell happened?

I mean, I feel foolish for even asking, because it seems to me these last several years would have been the time to bring it out, so obviously I&#039;m recalling a hallucination, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Science,</p>
<p>Some years ago, I heard of a GM technology that I have since referred to as an &#8220;electro-sled&#8221;.  It was a chassis containing a complete, gasoline-powered electric drive system onto which any number of automobile frames could be bolted, welded, or whatever.  Allegedly, it operated by drawing the electrons out of gasoline, or some such notion (fuel cell?), allegedly resulting in tremendous, daresay insane fuel efficiency.  They spent billions developing it, and I remember hearing, maybe a decade ago, and seeing on television news, that GM was celebrating some sort of milestone.  A bunch of executives standing around one of these electro-sleds, popping champagne corks while the press took pictures.  At that point, it should have been only several years before we started seeing cars in production.  And I haven&#8217;t heard a word about the thing since.  And now GM is teetering over the abyss, and we&#8217;re never going to see what should have started the migration away from the combustion engine.</p>
<p>Was this a dream?  If not, what the hell happened?</p>
<p>I mean, I feel foolish for even asking, because it seems to me these last several years would have been the time to bring it out, so obviously I&#8217;m recalling a hallucination, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nos</title>
		<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/11/10/general-motors-interesting-new-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>nos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearscience.org/?p=576#comment-398</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve been sayin this for years.... afaik, most industrial sized equipment (the ferries, diesel electric trains, those freakin huge catapiller dump trucks) are similar, except without the battery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve been sayin this for years&#8230;. afaik, most industrial sized equipment (the ferries, diesel electric trains, those freakin huge catapiller dump trucks) are similar, except without the battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why General Motors is Worth Saving</title>
		<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/11/10/general-motors-interesting-new-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Why General Motors is Worth Saving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearscience.org/?p=576#comment-391</guid>
		<description>[...] Nevermind the now-defunct EV-1&#8211;the first modern mass-produced electric car. GM&#8217;s heavy-duty hybrid technology would be far more revolutionary than Toyota&#8217;s. Likewise, the technology in a Chevy Volt does a far better job of playing to the strengths of electric and gas motors than any competing hybrid. For more technical details, you should hop over to DearScience.org for a technical explanation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nevermind the now-defunct EV-1&#8211;the first modern mass-produced electric car. GM&#8217;s heavy-duty hybrid technology would be far more revolutionary than Toyota&#8217;s. Likewise, the technology in a Chevy Volt does a far better job of playing to the strengths of electric and gas motors than any competing hybrid. For more technical details, you should hop over to DearScience.org for a technical explanation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
