<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dear Science &#187; Your Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearscience.org/category/societyandsci/your-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearscience.org</link>
	<description>Seattle's Only Scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 01:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Which Doll is the Nice Doll?</title>
		<link>http://dearscience.org/2009/03/06/which-doll-is-the-nice-doll/</link>
		<comments>http://dearscience.org/2009/03/06/which-doll-is-the-nice-doll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Golob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearscience.org/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preventing "children from being taught in public schools that 'same-sex marriage' is the same as traditional marriage" however does cause demonstrable harm. <a href="http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/brown/brown-brown.html">Kenneth B. Clark's "Doll Test"</a> tells us that letting proposition-8 stand will damage children who are <a href="http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/06/wait_why_are_there_gay_men">biologically determined to be attracted to the same sex</a>--telling them their capacity for love is wrong and beneath that of the heterosexual majority. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s so bad about allowing the people of California to vote in favor of a separate-but-equal form of domestic partnership for same-sex couples?</p>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WG7U1QsUd1g&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WG7U1QsUd1g&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at the pro-Prop 8 text from the official voters guide:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/argu-rebut/argu-rebutt8.htm">YES on Proposition 8 does three simple things</a>:<br />
It restores the definition of marriage to what the vast majority of California voters already approved and human history has understood marriage to be.</p>
<p>It overturns the outrageous decision of four activist Supreme Court judges who ignored the will of the people.</p>
<p>It protects our children from being taught in public schools that “same-sex marriage” is the same as traditional marriage.</p>
<p>Proposition 8 protects marriage as an essential institution of society. While death, divorce, or other circumstances may prevent the ideal, <strong>the best situation for a child is to be raised by a married mother and father</strong>.</p>
<p>The narrow decision of the California Supreme Court isn’t just about “live and let live.” State law may require teachers to instruct children as young as kindergarteners about marriage. (Education Code § 51890.) If the gay marriage ruling is not overturned, TEACHERS COULD BE REQUIRED to <strong>teach young children there is no difference between gay marriage and traditional marriage</strong>.</p>
<p>We should not accept a court decision that may result in public schools teaching our kids that gay marriage is okay. That is an issue for parents to discuss with their children according to their own values and beliefs. It shouldn’t be forced on us against our will.</p>
<p>Some will try to tell you that Proposition 8 takes away legal rights of gay domestic partnerships. That is false. Proposition 8 DOES NOT take away any of those rights and does not interfere with gays living the lifestyle they choose.</p></blockquote>
<p>Claiming &#8220;the best situation for a child is to be raised by a married mother and father&#8221; is false. Children raised in a household led by a same-sex couple <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15956875">are indistinguishable from those raised by heterosexual parents</a>. Study after study has demonstrated this.</p>
<p>Preventing &#8220;children from being taught in public schools that &#8216;same-sex marriage&#8217; is the same as traditional marriage&#8221; however does cause demonstrable harm. <a href="http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/brown/brown-brown.html">Kenneth B. Clark&#8217;s &#8220;Doll Test&#8221;</a> tells us that letting proposition-8 stand will damage children who are <a href="http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/06/wait_why_are_there_gay_men">biologically determined to be attracted to the same sex</a>&#8211;telling them their capacity for love is wrong and beneath that of the heterosexual majority. </p>
<p>The mob has no right, in our country, to strip a minority of its dignity. Make a note of it, California Supreme court. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dearscience.org/2009/03/06/which-doll-is-the-nice-doll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Suggestions For Your New Individual Right to Bear Arms</title>
		<link>http://dearscience.org/2008/06/26/some-suggestions-for-your-new-individual-right-to-bear-arms/</link>
		<comments>http://dearscience.org/2008/06/26/some-suggestions-for-your-new-individual-right-to-bear-arms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2nd Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberts Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saftey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearscience.org/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Enjoying your recently expanded rights under the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution? Wait, let me adjust that quote above to reflect the Roberts-court interpretation: A well regulated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Enjoying your recently expanded rights under the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution?</strong> Wait, let me adjust that quote above to reflect the Roberts-court interpretation:</p>
<blockquote><p>A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ahh, with those pesky commas out of the way, we can finally get down to business and discuss the meaning of your new rights&#8211;<strong>the <em>only</em> rights we&#8217;re likely to see expanded in our lifetimes.</strong></p>
<p>If you get a firearm:</p>
<p><strong>1. You have a reasonable chance of shooting yourself:</strong><br />
Between June 1, 1992, to May 31, 1994 about <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8637171">34,485 <em>accidentally</em> injured themselves non-fatally with a firearm</a>. This averages out to about 18,000 non-fatal injuries a year. </p>
<p><strong>2. If you manage to not shoot yourself, you have a reasonable chance of harming yourself with the gun anyways:</strong><br />
Not counting those who shot themselves, <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11144625">about sixteen-thousand people injury themselves with firearms each year in the United States</a> sufficiently to require a visit to the emergency room. Usually these injuries were the result of the routine handling of firearms, with 43% from recoil.</p>
<p>3. About half of children unintentionally shot&#8211;don&#8217;t worry, the majority of children <em>intentionally</em> shot are minorities&#8211;<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8904856">are shot in their own homes, with their parents own gun</a>. Another 40% are shot in the house of a friend or relative. To those of you working through the math, 90% of children injured by firearms are injured by a parent, relative or friend&#8217;s gun. </p>
<p>4. Somewhere <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9618633">between 2% and 12% of children live in a home with a firearm</a>.<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15701912">Four practices, in combination, can dramatically reduce the risk of these children injuring themselves</a> with the household&#8217;s firearm:<br />
1. Store the gun unloaded.<br />
2. Store the gun away from the ammo.<br />
3. Lock up the firearm.<br />
4. Lock up the ammo.</p>
<p>5. Programs that teach children gun safety&#8211;like the NRA Eddie Eagle Gun Safety Program&#8211;<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11389238">do not decrease the chance that young children will handle or attempt to fire a handgun</a> they stumble upon. </p>
<p><img src="http://dearscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/firearm.jpg" alt="" title="firearm" width="250" height="240" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-124" /></p>
<p>Have fun! Try to not to blast away too many of your children, your neighbors or yourself&#8211;even if <em>is</em> your Constitutional right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dearscience.org/2008/06/26/some-suggestions-for-your-new-individual-right-to-bear-arms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

